E-ISSN 2149-388X | ISSN 2149-0430
 

Original Research 


Comparison of Sleeve Surgery and Guillotine Technique in Circumcision

Mehmet Emin Celikkaya, Ahmet Atici, Cigdem El, Bulent Akcora.


Abstract
Introduction: Circumcision is the surgical removal prepisyum on the glans that is the oldest known in the history and still the most common operation in the world. Circumcision can be done with different surgical methods. We aimed to compare the two most widely used circumcision techniques in terms of the duration and complications of the operation.
Materials and methods: The records of 148 circumcised patients were retrospectively reviewed in the pediatric surgery clinic. 73 of the patients were circumcised by the same surgeon using the guillotine method. Seventy-five patients were surgically circumcised by another surgeon. All of the patients were circumcised under local anesthesia and sedation. Patients' operation time, complications after circumcision were compared.
Results: Complications seen; pain, edema, hemorrhage, abrasions on the glans, color change due to local anesthesia and infection in the circumcised area. There were no late complications in both groups. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of complications.
Conclusion: The techniques used in circumcision may vary from surgery to surgery. Eventually, they all reach the same result. The important thing is to pay attention to protect from complications.

Key words: Circumcision, complications, glans


 
ARTICLE TOOLS
Abstract
PDF Fulltext
How to cite this articleHow to cite this article
Citation Tools
Related Records
 Articles by Mehmet Emin Celikkaya
Articles by Ahmet Atici
Articles by Cigdem El
Articles by Bulent Akcora
on Google
on Google Scholar


How to Cite this Article
Pubmed Style

Celikkaya ME, Atici A, El C, Akcora B. Comparison of Sleeve Surgery and Guillotine Technique in Circumcision. Ulutas Med J. 2018; 4(3): 148-151. doi:10.5455/umj.20180522092808


Web Style

Celikkaya ME, Atici A, El C, Akcora B. Comparison of Sleeve Surgery and Guillotine Technique in Circumcision. https://www.ulutasmedicaljournal.com/?mno=299951 [Access: March 06, 2024]. doi:10.5455/umj.20180522092808


AMA (American Medical Association) Style

Celikkaya ME, Atici A, El C, Akcora B. Comparison of Sleeve Surgery and Guillotine Technique in Circumcision. Ulutas Med J. 2018; 4(3): 148-151. doi:10.5455/umj.20180522092808



Vancouver/ICMJE Style

Celikkaya ME, Atici A, El C, Akcora B. Comparison of Sleeve Surgery and Guillotine Technique in Circumcision. Ulutas Med J. (2018), [cited March 06, 2024]; 4(3): 148-151. doi:10.5455/umj.20180522092808



Harvard Style

Celikkaya, M. E., Atici, . A., El, . C. & Akcora, . B. (2018) Comparison of Sleeve Surgery and Guillotine Technique in Circumcision. Ulutas Med J, 4 (3), 148-151. doi:10.5455/umj.20180522092808



Turabian Style

Celikkaya, Mehmet Emin, Ahmet Atici, Cigdem El, and Bulent Akcora. 2018. Comparison of Sleeve Surgery and Guillotine Technique in Circumcision. THE ULUTAS MEDICAL JOURNAL, 4 (3), 148-151. doi:10.5455/umj.20180522092808



Chicago Style

Celikkaya, Mehmet Emin, Ahmet Atici, Cigdem El, and Bulent Akcora. "Comparison of Sleeve Surgery and Guillotine Technique in Circumcision." THE ULUTAS MEDICAL JOURNAL 4 (2018), 148-151. doi:10.5455/umj.20180522092808



MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style

Celikkaya, Mehmet Emin, Ahmet Atici, Cigdem El, and Bulent Akcora. "Comparison of Sleeve Surgery and Guillotine Technique in Circumcision." THE ULUTAS MEDICAL JOURNAL 4.3 (2018), 148-151. Print. doi:10.5455/umj.20180522092808



APA (American Psychological Association) Style

Celikkaya, M. E., Atici, . A., El, . C. & Akcora, . B. (2018) Comparison of Sleeve Surgery and Guillotine Technique in Circumcision. THE ULUTAS MEDICAL JOURNAL, 4 (3), 148-151. doi:10.5455/umj.20180522092808