Staphylococcus aureus is a microorganism, which is frequently isolated in community and hospital-acquired infections. S.aureus is an emergent infectious factor in soft tissue and respiratory system especially( 1 – 3 ). Transmission to patients can be caused from environmental as well as from a focus on their own body. These foci in the carriers are also the source of the transmission of the pathogen to susceptible persons. The most important focus in carriers is nasal carriage. Nasal S. aureus carriage (NSAC) is increasing in the community. This problem increases the risk of post-operative surgery wound infection, morbidity and mortality rates in all surgical and invasive procedures, especially in cardiovascular surgery, solid organ transplantation, and orthopedic implant surgery. In order to prevent infections, carriers should be identified and treated ( 1 , 4 – 7 ).

We did not find a study in which NSAC rate was compared in different groups in the national and international literature. As we reached, studies have been mostly conducted in healthy individuals. We think that our study will contribute to the literature on this subject. In our study, we aimed to compare NSAC and methicillin resistance in the patients who were planned for solid organ transplantation and the patients who were planned for other surgery, and healthy individuals who applied for job as the control group.

Of the 1425 patients, 41.05% were female and 58.95% were male. The mean age was 53.15± 15.13 years in females, and 53.63±17.03 years in males. S. aureus was detected in 19.86% of the samples. 91.5% of the isolates were susceptible to methicillin. NSAC carriage was detected in 20.78% of the patients who were planned for solid organ transplantation, 20.36% in the other surgery patients, and 15.92% in the healthy control group. Nasal S.aureus carriage rate was 20.5% in all patients planned for any surgery. In surgery patients nasal S. aureus carriage rate was higher than healthy individuals. However, there was no statistically significant difference between these groups (p=0.131). In addition, there was no statistically significant difference between three groups in terms of S. aureus carriage (p=0.882, p=0.16, p=0.164) (Table-1).

Methicillin resistance (MRSA) was found to be 8.48% in S. aureus isolates. There was no statistically significant difference between three groups in terms of MRSA carriage (p=0.473, p=0.742, p=0.281) (Table-2).

Nasal S. aureus carriage (NSAC) has been shown to play a key role in infections caused by S. aureus. Screening these patients is even more important for organ transplantation or other surgery ( 1 – 4 ). In our study, NSAC rate was found to be higher in the patients who planned other surgery (20.79%) and in the solid organ transplant recipients (20.36%) compared to the control (15.92%), however, the difference was statistically insignificant. Increasing the number of patients to be included in the study and the analysis of subgroups in the other surgery-planned patients may help to understand the reason or to confirm the result. In the national or international literature, we did not find any studies comparing the NSAC rate between different groups as in our study. In the national literature, the studies on NSAC were mostly investigated in healthy individuals and hospital staff. In the studies conducted in healthcare staff in, NSAC was reported to be between 8.7-36.4% (mean 20.4%), and methicillin resistance was between 0-39.4% (mean 11.4%) ( 8 – 17 ). In the study conducted by Kurutepe et al. ( 18 ), MRSA carriage was found to be 6.8% in clinical staff, and 1.2% in preclinical workers. In a study conducted by Ulug et al. ( 19 ), they found NSAC in 4.2% of surgical patients, and 3.2% of these strains were defined as MRSA. In another study conducted by the same authors, NSAC carriage rate was 25.9% among the staff working in operating room, neonatal and intensive care units of our hospital. A total of 11.1% among all S. aureus isolates were MRSA ( 20 ). In addition the nasal carriage for S.aureus in the patients undergoing hemodialysis in Turkey was reported to be between 32.3-67%, and for nasal MRSA carriage was reported from 9.4to27.2%( 21 – 23 ). In the study conducted by Weiser et al., the NSAC and MRSA carriage rates were similar (19.86% and 8.48%, respectively) ( 25 ). Price et al. ( 24 ) reported a high NSAC rate of 30.2% in patients who underwent surgical intervention. Bert et al. ( 26 ) reported NSAC rate as 36.8% in liver transplant recipients and as 9.1% for nasal MRSA carriage rate. They also reported that nasal MRSA carriage was associated with a very high risk of MRSA infection in liver transplant recipients ( 26 ). Abbasi et al. ( 27 ) reported NSAC rate as 14.6% in intensive care unit, and as 7.3% for the nasal MRSA carriage rate. They also raported that longer hospital stays, chronic diseases and undergoing surgery had the highest risk th for NSAC and MRSA carriage ( 27 ). Sollid et al. ( 28 ) reported a quite extensive meta-analysis about NSAC and MRSA carriage. In our study NSAC and MRSA carriage rates were similar to some of these studies. These studies showed that the highest rate was reported in the surgical departments among the clinics. This situation can be explained by the fact that MRSA carriage is higher in surgical patients and consequently the carriage of the staff who care the patient is higher. Also, history of catheter infection was determined as an independent risk factor for the nasal MRSA carriage. In our study, the NSAC rate was similar in the solid organ transplant recipients (20.79%) and other surgical patients (20.36%). However, these rates are higher than the healthy control group (15.92%). However, there was no statistically significant difference among these three groups. In addition, a bit a higher rate was found in terms of MRSA carriage rate as 10% in solid organ transplantation and as 6.8% in other surgical patients. Nevertheless, there was no statistically significant difference between groups. When the data in these studies are evaluated together with the results of the healthy individuals who apply for job, it shows that NSAC rate is low in healthy individuals in the society. In our study, the rates we determined for NSAC and MRSA were lower than that of overseas studies, which reported a higher rates between 20-50%( 18 ).

One of the studies indicating that NSAC affects morbidity and may present as a serious infectious agent in the body following a focus is the study of von Eiff et al. ( 29 ). Preoperative screening in terms of S. aureus carriage and performing decolonization in case of presence of carriage has been reported to decrease the risk of postoperative infections in patients scheduled for surgery ( 6 – 8 ). The commonly used antibiotic for nasal decolonization is mupirocin. The World Health Organization strongly recommends the application of 2% mupirocin ( _± chlorhexidine bath) in the presence of nasal S. aureus carriage in patients planned for cardiothoracic and orthopedic surgery. Intranasal mupirocin cream was applied twice a day for five days before the surgery. Eradication should be confirmed by a control culture after 48 hours. Chlorhexidine is another alternative to intranasal administration of gluconate gel ( 1 , 4 ). Our country is trying to take place among the countries of the world in terms of health tourism. It is a requirement for health tourism to obtain a certificate from international accreditation bodies, especially the Joint Commission International (JCI) ( 30 ). To ensure patient safety in all care standards, JCI also includes NSAC screening in the list of measures and procedures to prevent infections ( 1 , 4 ). Our hospital is accredited by JCI, and uses an effective NSAC carrier screening program for patients planned for cardiovascular surgery and orthopedic implant surgery, especially for solid organ transplant candidates ( 31 , 32 ).

Different rates have been reported in various studies for NSAC and MRSA carriage. However, the most important of these cases seems to be the surgery patients. In our study, organ transplant patients had the higher risk in terms of infection. In conclusion, since the higher risk for infection in these patients due to the immunosuppressive treatment, the need to be more careful in this patient group has once again come to the fore. S. aureus colonization in the community is seen intensively in patients who are planned for surgery and in healthy individuals. Patients undergoing surgery are at greater risk for complications associated with NSAC. Preoperative screening for S. aureus carriage and in decolonization in case of presence of carriage, will reduce the risk of postoperative infections In addition, we believe that screening and necessary treatment for NSAC for health workers who are involved in the treatment of surgical patients will reduce the hospital-acquired S. aureus transmission and hospital infections.