<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article
PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN"
       "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.3/JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" dtd-version="1.3" article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Ulutas Med J</journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>The Ulutas Medical Journal</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title>Ulutas Med J</abbrev-journal-title>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn pub-type="ppub">2149-0430</issn>
   <issn pub-type="epub">2149-388X</issn>
   <publisher>
    <publisher-name>Hayriye Zehra Ulutaş</publisher-name>
   </publisher>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5455/umj.20160922084115</article-id>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">239004</article-id>
   <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
     <subject>Original Research</subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="subject">
     <subject>Cardiac Surgery</subject>
    </subj-group>
   </article-categories>
   <title-group>
    <article-title>Prevelans of Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal Complaints and Its Relationship with Risk Factors for Bank Employees Working with Computer</article-title>
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
     <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid" authenticated="false">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1842-3058</contrib-id>
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>ozvurmaz</surname>
      <given-names>Safiye</given-names>
     </name>
     <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Conceptualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
     <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Data curation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/">Data curation</role>
     <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Formal analysis" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/">Formal analysis</role>
     <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Funding acquisition" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/">Funding acquisition</role>
     <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Investigation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role>
     <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Methodology" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role>
     <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Project administration" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/">Project administration</role>
     <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Resources" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/">Resources</role>
     <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Software" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/">Software</role>
     <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Supervision" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/">Supervision</role>
     <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Validation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/">Validation</role>
     <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Visualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/">Visualization</role>
     <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing – original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing – original draft</role>
     <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing – review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing – review &amp; editing</role>
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author">
     <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid" authenticated="false">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0873-4805</contrib-id>
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>Mandiracioglu</surname>
      <given-names>Aliye</given-names>
     </name>
     <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Conceptualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
     <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Data curation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/">Data curation</role>
     <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Formal analysis" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/">Formal analysis</role>
     <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Funding acquisition" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/">Funding acquisition</role>
     <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Investigation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role>
     <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Methodology" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role>
     <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Project administration" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/">Project administration</role>
     <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Resources" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/">Resources</role>
     <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Software" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/">Software</role>
     <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Supervision" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/">Supervision</role>
     <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Validation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/">Validation</role>
     <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Visualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/">Visualization</role>
     <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing – original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing – original draft</role>
     <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing – review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing – review &amp; editing</role>
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
    </contrib>
    <aff id="aff1">
     <label>1</label>
     <institution-wrap>
      <institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/03n7yzv56</institution-id>
      <institution>Adnan Menderes University, Faculty of Nursing, Public Health Nursing Department, Aydin, Turkiye</institution>
     </institution-wrap>
    </aff>
    <aff id="aff2">
     <label>2</label>
     <institution-wrap>
      <institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/00m9dbm09</institution-id>
      <institution>Professor, Ege University, Medical School, Public Health Department</institution>
     </institution-wrap>
    </aff>
   </contrib-group>
   <pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2017-06-28">
    <day>28</day>
    <month>06</month>
    <year>2017</year>
   </pub-date>
   <pub-date publication-format="print" date-type="collection">
    <year>2017</year>
   </pub-date>
   <volume>3</volume>
   <issue>2</issue>
   <fpage>39</fpage>
   <lpage>47</lpage>
   <history>
    <date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2016-08-10">
     <day>10</day>
     <month>08</month>
     <year>2016</year>
    </date>
    <date date-type="rev-recd" iso-8601-date="2017-02-23">
     <day>23</day>
     <month>02</month>
     <year>2017</year>
    </date>
    <date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2017-05-17">
     <day>17</day>
     <month>05</month>
     <year>2017</year>
    </date>
   </history>
   <permissions>
    <copyright-statement>© 2017 The Author(s)</copyright-statement>
    <copyright-year>2017</copyright-year>
    <license>
     <ali:license_ref>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/</ali:license_ref>
     <license-p>This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC 4.0 licence.</license-p>
    </license>
   </permissions>
   <self-uri xlink:href="https://www.ulutasmedicaljournal.com/?mno=239004"/>
   <self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="https://www.ulutasmedicaljournal.com/pdf/239004.pdf"/>
   <abstract>
    <p>Aim: To determine the frequency and risk factors of upper extremity musculoskeletal complaints (UE-WMSCs) of the bank employees working with computer. Method: This cross-sectional observational study was conducted among 221 bank employees between July and September 2013 in Aydın, Turkey. For data collection socio-demographic characteristics and working environment form, evaluation of upper extremity musculoskeletal symptoms with visual analogue scale (VAS) form, MSC (Musculoskeletal complaints) preventive behaviors and Karasek job strain scale was used. Results: The rate of existence of a symptom anywhere in upper body area is 61.1%, and the average VAS pain intensity is 1.8±2.8. The most common complaint is reported in the left neck (66.5%) and left shoulder (28.5%) areas. The least existence of symptoms is found out in left elbow region (13.1%). Average scale points for psycho-social elements of workload, control over the work and social support are determined as 72.3±19.4, 69.1±19.6 and 74.7±19.8 respectively. The average score for work stress is determined to be 1.0±0.26 (0.61-2.0). There has been found out a close relationship between the risk for musculoskeletal complaints on one hand and age, the number of children, working time and work control on the other hand. Conclusion: Neck and shoulders are most affected areas in the bodies of bank employees working with a computer. It is found out that socio-demographic characteristics, working conditions, and work control are closely connected with UE-WMSC.</p>
   </abstract>
   <kwd-group kwd-group-type="author">
    <kwd>Bank employees</kwd>
    <kwd>Upper extremity</kwd>
    <kwd>Work-related musculoskeletal complaints</kwd>
   </kwd-group>
   <funding-group>
    <funding-statement>Funding information was not reported in the published version of this article.</funding-statement>
   </funding-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <body>
  <sec id="sec-1">
   <title>Introduction</title>
   <p id="b-1">It is reported that work-related musculo skeletal complaints (WMSCs) make up 42-58% of all occupational diseases (    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
). More than 25% of working population in Europe have musculoskeletal symptoms (    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
). It is also repor-ted that WMCs constitute 40% of the injuries for which work compensation paid in USA (    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
). The studies show that age and gender as socio-demographic factors and as vocational factors, repetitive movements, static physical posture, daily time spent using computer, heavy workload and poor working conditions are risk factors for WMCs (    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
,    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
,    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
).Employees in the banking sectors are subject to long hours of static work, bad posture and activities of repetitive computer use. Therefore, the duties of bank employees make them prone to WMSCs (    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
,    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
). Working in the same posture for long periods of time, repetitive movements and agronomical inadequacies in work environments bring about several health problems, in particular,musculoskeletal complaints. These health problems result in serious loss of time, economic value and workforce, and increase the importance of the subject. The purpose of this study is to determine upper extremity musculoskeletal complaints of bank employees working with computer and to evaluate its relationship with psychosocial factors in the work environment and other risk factors.</p>
  </sec>
  <sec id="sec-2">
   <title>Methodology</title>
  </sec>
  <sec id="sec-3">
   <title>Study design</title>
   <p id="b-2">This cross-sectional and observational study was carried out in the Center of Aydın Province between July and September 2013. Study workgroup covers bank employees working with thecomputer (WWCs) in Aydın Provincial Center, who agreed to attend the study.</p>
   <sec id="sec-4">
    <title>Setting and sample</title>
    <p id="b-3">The bank employees who use acomputer at least 10 hours in a week are included in the group while pregnant women and those who had motor vehicle accidents during last one year were excluded. 221 WWCs attended the study.56.1% of the participants in the study are male, the average age is 33.9±7.1 and %91.1 of the participants areuniversity graduates.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="sec-5">
    <title>Measurement/Instruments</title>
    <p id="b-4">In this study “Visual Analogue Scale” (VAS) is used to find out upper body MS complaints. It measures the intensity of pain of the symptom (complaint, pain, numbness, tingling, weakness, incompetence, etc.). This scale, whose validity and reliability is already tested(     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
), is 10 cm long and graded over a vertical or horizontal line (0=no pain and 10=most severe pain). The person attending the study is asked to mark the point over this line, which corresponds to the level of his/her pain. The distance between the point which is marked and the lowest point of this line (0=no pain) is measured in cm, and the numerical value represents the intensity of pain of the patient’s pain (     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
). The existence of the symptom is accepted in cases where the patient declares the intensity of pain of his/her pain over 5.</p>
    <p id="b-5">Psycho-social elements are measured by using Karasek’s workload-control-social support model. For this purpose, a psycho-social information form is used (     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
). Psycho-social factors information form is composed of 17 questions with an answer format of four-point Likert scale. The validity of the scale is tested by Demiral et al (     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
,     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>
). According to this model,the interaction between psychosocial work-load and work control determines work stress level. Workload describes the demand for necessary power and the density of the work which also covers speed of work. Work control shows the employee’s skill level, the possibilities of using this skill and involvement in the decision-making procedures in the execution of the work. Comparing the workload with work control results in the calculation of a value called “work tension” or “work stress.” For workload, control and social support subsections of the scale, Cronbach’s alpha coefficients vary between 0.51-0.72.Total score for work control is calculated by adding up scores obtained for use of skills and decision freedom. High scores mean high workload, work control, and high social support. Work tension is valued as the ratio of workload over work control.Socio-demographic attributes of the participants, working conditions and their activities/behaviors aimed at preventing upper body musculoskeletal complaints are also evaluated through a questionnaire.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="sec-6">
    <title>Data Collection/ Procedure</title>
    <p id="b-6">Data were collected using face to face and anonymous questionnaire. Written approvals are obtained from participants and from The Turkish Ministry of Health, Public Hospitals Institution, Tepecik Education and Research Hospital’s Ethics Committee which is numbered 51/11.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="sec-7">
    <title>Statistical analysis</title>
    <p id="b-7">Data is analyzed with SPSS v15. Numbers and percentages of the participants are calculated according to socio-demographic variables.Chi-square test, studentst-test, and logistics regression are used in the analysis; averages are given together with standard deviations. For statistical significance, it is assumed that p&lt;0.05.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec>
  <sec id="sec-8">
   <title>Results</title>
   <p id="b-8">Distribution of bank employees, who participated in the study, in terms ofcertain sociodemographical attributes is given in Table-1. It is reported that 56.1% of bank employees are male,65.6% married,81.1% university graduate and 50.2% of the participants do not have children. Bank employees report that 38.9% of them smoke while 19.9% do physical exercise. According to evaluation of body mass index, 61.5% of participants are of medium weight. 93.2% of the participants have not had any training related to office ergonomics.The existence of a symptom in any part of the participating bank employees is 61.1%, and the average for the body is 1.8±2.8; the highest existence is in the left neck region with 66.5% and in the left shoulder region with 28.5%. The lowest existence of symptom is in left elbow region with 13.1%. The general rate of symptom existence is 47.5% for the left side of body and 49.3% for right part of body (Table-2). Four different types of scores are obtained for psychosocial elements: work-load, control over the work score, social support score and work stress score (Table-3).</p>
   <table-wrap id="tbl-1" position="float">
    <label>Table 1</label>
    <caption>
     <title>Sociodemographic characteristics of participants</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic xlink:href="tbl-1.png">
     <alt-text>Table 1: Sociodemographic characteristics of participants</alt-text>
    </graphic>
   </table-wrap>
   <p id="b-9">When MSC preventive behaviors are evaluated, the average score for doing exercise is found as 2.3±1.52.3 while these numbers are 3.1±1.7and2.6±1.5 for the frequency of giving short breaks and for paying attention to posture. Distribution of the symptoms according to certain attributes of the participants are shown in table-4.</p>
   <p id="b-10">The existence of the symptoms is observed to be more in women, older people, married people, people with kids and people working longer hours. When the existence of upper body musculoskeletal symptoms and psycho-social elements are considered together, there exists a meaningful relationship between skill scores and scores for control over the work (Table-5).</p>
   <table-wrap id="tbl-2" position="float">
    <label>Table 3</label>
    <caption>
     <title>Psychosocial factors in work life of participants</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic xlink:href="tbl-3.png">
     <alt-text>Table 3: Psychosocial factors in work life of participants</alt-text>
    </graphic>
   </table-wrap>
   <table-wrap id="tbl-3" position="float">
    <label>Table 2</label>
    <caption>
     <title>Distribution of upper body symptoms for participants</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic xlink:href="tbl-2.png">
     <alt-text>Table 2: Distribution of upper body symptoms for participants</alt-text>
    </graphic>
   </table-wrap>
   <table-wrap id="tbl-4" position="float">
    <label>Table 4</label>
    <caption>
     <title>Distribution of symptom existence according to certain characteristics of the participants</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic xlink:href="tbl-4.png">
     <alt-text>Table 4: Distribution of symptom existence according to certain characteristics of the participants</alt-text>
    </graphic>
   </table-wrap>
   <table-wrap id="tbl-5" position="float">
    <label>Table 5</label>
    <caption>
     <title>Distribution of symptom existence in accordance with participants’ psychosocial elements</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic xlink:href="tbl-5.png">
     <alt-text>Table 5: Distribution of symptom existence in accordance with participants’ psychosocial elements</alt-text>
    </graphic>
   </table-wrap>
  </sec>
  <sec id="sec-9">
   <title>Discussion</title>
   <p id="b-11">Prevalence of upper body musculoskeletal symptoms for bank employees working with computer and risk factors affecting this situation are determined. In this study, therate of symptom existence in any part of theupper body is found to be 61.1%. This result is in line with previous research by which the prevalence is reported between 27% and 63% (    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>
). In a study carried by Abledu et al., the density of upper body area symptoms within last 12 months is found to be 83.5% (    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>
,    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>
), while Bhanderi reported frequency as 72.2% (    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
,    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>
). As a result of a study over the density of upper body region symptoms within last 12 months, it is observed that neck and shoulder symptoms are more prevalent. It is understood that symptom prevalence is higher in the left region of the body than in the right region and that the lowest prevalence is observed in the left elbow region. UE-WMSC prevalence in elbow region is found to be lower than what is repor-ted in previous studies, between 6.0%- 30% (    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">16</xref>
). This situation could be explained by the joint structure of elbows, by use of handarm support and by the fact that degenerative diseases are less observed in this region.In a cross-sectional study carried out in Kuwait to determine existence of UE-WMSC for bank employees, prevalence of MSC is found to be 80% while the most affected parts of the body are neck (53.5%), waists (51,1%), shoulders (49.2%) and back (38.4%) (    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">17</xref>
). In Balcı’s dis- sertation study covering the bank employees in Gaziantep Province, the prevalence of musculoskeletal complaints is determined as 58.5%, while the most common complaints are reported as waist pains (29.0%), back pain (28,8%) and neck pain (27.9%)(    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">18</xref>
). Jensen et al. showed that the most common symptoms for women working in call centers are observed in neck (53%), which is followed by shoulders (42%) and hand-wrist area (30%) (    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">19</xref>
). In his study Wood reports that participants had musculoskeletal complaints at least once in a year; 56% of the participants experienced musculoskeletal disorders within last week, and 20% of the participants experienced musculoskeletal disorders that had hindered working (    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">20</xref>
). Çalık et al. found out that white-collar workers have most common musculoskeletal complaints in theback of the body (69.9%), in the waist (68%), neck (67.1%) and 50.6% in right shoulder (    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">21</xref>
).In a study carried out by Klussmann et al., it is shown that the symptoms of last one year are reported in theneck (55%), shoulders (38%), hand-wrist (21%) and elbow and forearm (15%) (    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">22</xref>
). In this study, it is found out that individual factors such as age, thenumber of children, working time and scores of psychosocial factors such as skill and control over the work are related with UE- WMSC. Viikari et al. determined that the risk of WMSC in the neck and upper extremity increases with advancing age (    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">23</xref>
).</p>
   <p id="b-12">In some studies, it is reported that complaints in arms, wrist and hand increase after theage of 40 (    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">24</xref>
,    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">25</xref>
). Torqvist et al. reported that neck and shoulder symptoms slightly increase between ages of 40 and 48 while after the age of 50, an increase in shoulder symptoms are observed (    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">26</xref>
). Holmström et al. studied the relationship between age and musculoskeletal complaints and observed that they increase with advancing age (    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">27</xref>
).</p>
   <p id="b-13">Mostly in literature it is reported that MSC is more common for women than men (    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
,    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">21</xref>
,    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">25</xref>
,    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">28</xref>
–    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">30</xref>
). The possibility of development of a musculoskeletal problem is higher for women working in thebank compared to men. Being a woman is reported as a risk factor for the progress of MSC (    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">31</xref>
). However, no statistical significance is determined (p&gt;0.05). In some studies, it is reported that women had more symptoms given their domestic workload and child care (    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">30</xref>
,    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">31</xref>
).</p>
   <p id="b-14">In this study, no significant statistical relationship is found out between working with the computer (WWC) and musculoskeletal complaints (p&lt;0.11). In a similar way, in some studies carried out, no relationship is observed between WWC and UE-WMSC (    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">33</xref>
,    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">34</xref>
). Viester et al. in a study carried out in Holland, found out the relationship between musculoskeletal complaints and body-mass index (    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref35">35</xref>
). In this study, no relationship was found between UE-WMSC and smoking, regular sports and stretching exercises. However, physical activity has many positive effects such as protection of muscular force, protection of body shape and posture, reducing fatigue, protection against muscle contraction, maintenance of bone mineral density, body protection against injuries and accidents, etc.(    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref36">36</xref>
). In this study, a relationship was observed between working time and existence of musculoskeletal symptoms. In a similar study, (statistical) significance was observed between working time and UE-WMSC (    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">22</xref>
,    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">37</xref>
). In many studies, smoking is evaluated as an individual risk factor affecting the development of musculoskeletal diseases. However, no relationship has been reported in this study. No relationship has been established between musculoskeletal symptom development and the frequency of having short breaks and controlling body posture.</p>
   <p id="b-15">In previous epidemiologic studies, it was reported that short resting breaks have positive effects (    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
,    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">37</xref>
,    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">38</xref>
). Use of screen is diminished together with short breaks, muscle load due to poor ergonomic conditions is decreased. Short breaks provide muscular relief and recovery (4, 39,45). In this study, statistical significance is determined between UE-WMSC and control over the work. Especially imbalance between the workload and control for the employees results in work stress. Bot et al. found out that sickness absenteeism increases for employees with high workload and low work control (    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref40">40</xref>
). In previous studies, psychosocial factors are evaluated as determinant factors for WMSC (22,39,4142,43,44).</p>
  </sec>
  <sec id="sec-10">
   <title>Conclusion</title>
   <p id="b-16">It is found out that frequency of neck and shoulder musculoskeletal symptoms are most commonly observed in bank employees working with acomputer. The presence of upper body musculoskeletal symptoms are observed more with advancing age, for women, married, people with children, people with more working hours. It is also understood that skill and control over the work are among the workplace psychosocial elements that constitute risk factors for upper body musculoskeletal symptoms. It is necessary that preventive programs for musculoskeletal symptoms of bank employees should concentrate primarily on neck and shoulder disorders. It is also important to get rid of psychosocial factors that are negatively affecting the health of bank employees.</p>
  </sec>
 </body>
 <back>
  <ref-list>
   <title>References</title>
   <ref id="ref1">
    <label>1</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Griffiths KL, Mackey MG, Adamson BJ. Behavioral and psychophysiological responses to job demands and association with musculoskeletal symptoms in computer work. J Occup Rehabil 2011;21(4):482-92.</mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="ref2">
    <label>2</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Smith S, Salaway G, Caruso BJ. The ECAR study of under graduate students and information technology: Research study:EDUCAUSE center for applied research 2009. https:/ /net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ers0906/rs/ERS0906w.pdf</mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="ref3">
    <label>3</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">National Research Council, The National Academy of Sciences. Musculo skeletal disorders and the workplace: low back and upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders. Washington (DC): National Academy Press. 2001.</mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="ref4">
    <label>4</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Andersen JH, Fallentin N, Thomsen JF, Mikkelsen SH. Risk factors for neck and upper extremity disorders among computers users and the effect of interventions: an overview of systematicreviews. PLoSOne 2011;12; 6(5).</mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="ref5">
    <label>5</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ranasinghe P, Perera YS, Lamabadusuriya DA, Kulatunga S, Jayawardana N, Rajapakse S, et al. Work related complaints of neck, shoulder and arm among computer office workers: A cross- sectional evaluation of prevalence and risk factors in a developingcountry. EnvironHealth 2011; 10 (1),1.</mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="ref6">
    <label>6</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Abledu J and Abledu K. Multiple Logistic Regression Analysis of Predictors of Musculoskeletal Disorders and Disability among Bank Workers in Kumasi, Ghana. J Ergonomics 2012;2:111-5.</mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="ref7">
    <label>7</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Wu S, He L, Li J, Wang J, Wang S. Visual Display Terminal Use Increases the Prevalence and Risk of Work-related Musculoskeletal Disorders among Chinese Office Workers: A Cross- sectional Study. J Occup Health 2012;54:34-43.</mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="ref8">
    <label>8</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Podniece Z. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders: prevention report European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. 2008. Luxembourg, Belgium.</mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="ref9">
    <label>9</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Cho C, Hwang Y, Cherng R. Musculoskeletal Symptoms and Associated Risk Factors Among Office Workers With High Workload Computer Use. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2012;35(7):534-540.</mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="ref10">
    <label>10</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Price DD, McGrath PA, Rafii A, Buckingham B. The validation of visualanaloguescales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain. Pain; 1983; 17:45-56.</mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="ref11">
    <label>11</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Punnett L, Wegman DH. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders: the epidemiologic evidence and the debate. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2004;14:13–23.</mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="ref12">
    <label>12</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Demiral Y, Ünal B, Kılıç B, ve ark. İş Stresi Ölçeğinin İzmir Konak Belediyesi’nde Çalışan Erkek İşçilerde Geçerlilik ve Güvenirliliğinin İncelenmesi. Toplum Hekimliği Bülteni, Ocak-Nisan 2007;26(1): 11-18.</mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="ref13">
    <label>13</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Baldwin ML, Butler RJ. Upper extremity disorders in the workplace: costs and outcomes beyond the first return to work. J Occup Rehabil 2006; 16:303-323.</mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="ref14">
    <label>14</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Bhanderi D, Choudhary SK, Parmar L and Doshi V. A study of occurrence of musculoskeletal discomfort in computer operators. Indian J Community Med 2008; 33(1): 65–66.</mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="ref15">
    <label>15</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Naidoo RN, Haq SA.Occupational use syndromes. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2008;22(4):667-691.</mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="ref16">
    <label>16</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Fourth European Working Conditions Survey, 2007. http:// www.eurofound.europa.eu/pubdocs/2006/98/en/2/ef0698 en. pdf</mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="ref17">
    <label>17</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Akrouf QA, Crawford JO, Al-Shatti AS, Kamel MI. Musculo skeletal disorders among bank officeworkers in Kuwait. East Mediterr Health J.2010;16(1).</mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="ref18">
    <label>18</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Balcı Ö. Gaziantep İl Merkezindeki Bankaların Büro ergo-nomisine uygunluk durumları ve banka çalışanlarının bazı sağlık yakınmaları.Gaziantep Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Halk Sağlığı Anabilim Dalı, doktora tezi. 2007. Risk Factors for Bank Employees using Computer Safiye Ozvurmaz, et al.</mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="ref19">
    <label>19</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Jensen C et al. Musculoskeletal symptoms and duration of computer and mouse use. Int J Ind Ergon,2002,30(4-5):265-75.</mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="ref20">
    <label>20</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Woods V. Musculoskeletal disorders and visual strain in intensive data processing workers. Occup Med 2005; 55 (2):21–7.</mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="ref21">
    <label>21</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Çalık BB, Orçin TA, Başkan E, Gökçe B. Bilgisayar Kullanan Masa Başı Çalışanlarında Kas İskelet Sistemi Rahatsızlıkları, İşin Engellenmesi ve Risk Faktörlerinin İncelenmesi Marmara Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi: 2013;3(4):208-214.</mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="ref22">
    <label>22</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Klussmann A, Gebhardt H, Liebers F, Rieger MA. Musculoskeletal symptoms of the upper extremities and the neck: a cross sectional study on prevalence and symptom predicting factors at visual display terminal (VDT) workstations. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2008;9:96.</mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="ref23">
    <label>23</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Viikari JE, Martinikainen R, Lukkonen R, Mutanen P, Takala EP, Riihimäki H. Longitudinalstudy on work related and individual risk factors affecting radiating neck pain. Occup Environ Med 2001; 58: 345-352.</mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="ref24">
    <label>24</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Gerr F, Marcus M, Ensor C, Kleinbaum D, Cohen S, Edwards A, Gentry E, Ortiz DJ, Monteilh C. A.Prospective study of computer users: I. Study design and incidence of musculoskeletal symptoms and disorders. Am J Ind Med 2002; 41: 221-235.</mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="ref25">
    <label>25</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Wahlström J, Svensson J, Hagberg M, Johnson PW. Differences between work methods and gender in computer mouse use. Scand J Work Environ Health 2000; 26(5):390-7.</mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="ref26">
    <label>26</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Tornqvist EW, Hagberg M, Hagman M, Risberg EH, Toomingas A. Theinfluence of working conditions and individual factors on the incidence of neck and upper limb symptoms among Professional computer users. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2009; 82(6):689-702.</mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="ref27">
    <label>27</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Holmström E, Engholm G. Musculoskeletaldisorders in relation to age and occupation in Swedish construction workers. Am J Ind Med 2003;44(4):377-384.</mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="ref28">
    <label>28</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Guo HR, Chang YC, Yeh WY, Chen CW, Guo YL. Prevalence of Musculoskeletal Disorder among Workers in Taiwan: A Nationwide Study. J Occup Health 2004; 246: 26-36.</mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="ref29">
    <label>29</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Janwantanakul P, Pensri P, Jiamjarasrangsri V, Sinsongsook T. Prevalence of self-reported musculoskeletal symptoms among office workers. Occup Med 2008; 58: 436-438.</mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="ref30">
    <label>30</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Krantz B K(ed). The Swedish Work Environment Authority. Musculoskeletal ergonomics statistics. The Swedish Work Environment Authority. 2006; p.6-11.</mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="ref31">
    <label>31</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Boogar RI,Mirkouhi G M. Psychosocial and Occupational Risk Factors of Musculoskeletal Pains Among Computer Users: Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study in Iran. IJOH 2013; 5(2):46-52.</mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="ref32">
    <label>32</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Krantz G, Berntsson L, Lundberg U. Total workload, work stress and perceived. Eur J Public Health 2005;15(2): 209-214.</mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="ref33">
    <label>33</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Loghmani A, Golshiri P, Zamani A, Kheirmand M, Jafari N. Musculoskeletal symptoms and job satisfaction among Office-workers: A Cross- sectionalstudyfrom Iran. Acta Med Acad. 2013;42(1):46-54.</mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="ref34">
    <label>34</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Roquelaure Y, Ha C, Rouillon C, Fouquet N, Leclerc A, Descatha A et.al. Risk Factors for Upper-Extremity Musculo skeletal Disorders in the Working Population. Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Oct 15;61(10):1425-34.</mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="ref35">
    <label>35</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Viester L, Verhagen EA, OudeHengel KM, Koppes LL, van der Beek AJ, Bongers PM.The relation between body mass index and musculoskeletal symptoms in the working population. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2013;14:238</mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="ref36">
    <label>36</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Bozhüyük A, Özcan S, Kurdak H, Akpınar E, Saatçı E, Bozdemir N.Sağlıklı Yaşam Biçimi ve Aile Hekimliği. TJFMPC 2012;6(1).</mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="ref37">
    <label>37</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Akrouf QA, Crawford JO, Al-Shatti AS, Kamel MI. Musculo skeletal disorders among bank officeworkers in Kuwait. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal, EMHJ. 2010;16 (1):94-100.</mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="ref38">
    <label>38</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Cagnie B, Danneels L, Van Tiggelen D, De Loose V, Cambier D. Individual and work related risk factors for neck pain among Office workers: a cross sectional study. Eur Spine J. 2007 May;16(5):679-86.</mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="ref39">
    <label>39</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Mclean L, Tingley M, Scott RN, Rickards J.Computer terminal work and the benefit of microbreaks. Appl Ergon 2001;32(3):225-237.</mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="ref40">
    <label>40</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Bot SD, Terwee, CB, van der Windt, DA et al. Work-related physical and psychosocial risk factors for sick leave in patients with neck or upper extremity complaints. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2007;80(8):733-741.</mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="ref41">
    <label>41</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ariens GA, van Mechelen W, Bongers PM, Bouter LM, van der Wal G. Psychosocial risk factors for neck pain. Am J Ind Med 2001;39: 180-193.</mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="ref42">
    <label>42</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Devereux JJ, Vlachonikolis IG, Buckle PW. Epidemiological study to investigate potential interaction between physical and psychosocial factors at work that may increase the risk of symptoms of musculoskeletal disorders of the neck and upperlimb. Occup Environ Med 2002;59:269-277.</mixed-citation>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>
