Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is defined as the involuntary loss of urine during physical exertion or activity that increase intraabdominal pressure, such as coughing, sneezing, or lifting ( 1 ). It is a highly prevalent condition in women, affecting up to 35% of the female population ( 2 ). Despite its widespread occurrence, SUI remains underdiagnosed and undertreated, causing impairments in quality of life, self-esteem, and social interactions ( 3 ).

Several factors contribute to the development of SUI in women, including aging, obesity, parity, and hormonal changes ( 4 ). The condition arises from a complex interplay of anatomical, neurological, and hormonal factors that weaken the pelvic floor and urethral support structure ( 5 ). Conservative approaches, including lifestyle modifications, pelvic floor muscle training, and behavioural therapies, are usually the first-line treatment options ( 6 ). However, surgical interventions may be necessary for cases of moderate-to-severe SUI unresponsive to conservative measures ( 7 ). Among the surgical techniques for SUI, transobturator tape (TOT), tension-free vaginal tape (TVT), Burch Colpopexy (BC) and Repair of Anterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse (ARP) are widely used ( 8 ). These procedures aim to reinforce the weakened pelvic support structures and restore the anatomical and functional integrity of the urinary continence system ( 9 ). While each of these approaches has its merits, the selection of the most suitable technique depends on patient factors, surgeon experience, and the specific clinical context.

Comparative studies on the outcomes of these surgical techniques for SUI are sparse and limited in scope. Therefore, this study aims to assess and compare the outcomes of TOT, TVT, BC and ARP in SUI.

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from 62 adult women who had primary SUI at a single tertiary care centre. We compared demographic and clinical characteristics among four groups of patients who underwent various surgical treatments for pelvic organ prolapse or urinary incontinence, including Tension-free Vaginal Tape (TVT), Trans-Obturator Tape (TOT), Burch Colpopexy (BC), and Anterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse Repair (APR). Included were adult women aged 18 years or older, with a primary diagnosis of SUI who received one of the 3 surgical treatments. Exclusion criteria were previous surgery for SUI, concurrent pelvic organ prolapse surgery, neurogenic bladder,insufficient medical records and unwillingness to join to study.

Our findings revealed no differences in age, weight, height, and BMI among the four groups (p-values 0.227, 0.943, 0.333, and 0.642, respectively). Furthermore, the distribution of menopausal patients, those with a history of difficult birth, caesarean section, abortion, TAH- BSO surgery, and infection did not significantly differ among the four groups. The prevalence of patients who had experienced stress, Stress+Urge, and urge incontinence types also showed no significant differences among the groups (Table-1).

In the TVT group, 14 patients (77.8%) were prescribed postoperative anticholinergic care, compared to 33 patients (80.5%) in the TOT group, 4 patients (100%) in the BC group, and 3 patients (75%) in the APR group. However, the differences were not significant (p=0.769). Similarly, the mean duration of anticholinergic use showed no differences across the groups (p=0.531). Preoperative daily pad usage was similar across the four groups, with no statistically significant differences (p=0.61).

In terms of cystocele grading, no differences were found among the groups (p=0.065). The majority of the patients had a grade 2 cystocele in the TVT, TOT, and BC groups. In the rectocele grading, although the BC group showed 100% grade 1 rectocele, this difference was not statistically significant compared to the other groups (p=0.126).

Our retrospective cohort study evaluated various surgical treatments for primary stress SUI in adult women, including TOT, TVT, BC, and APR. Our findings revealed no differences in demographic and clinical characteristics, including age, weight, BMI, menopausal status, reproductive history, and incontinence types, among the four treatment groups. These results provide a balanced foundation for assessing the outcomes of different surgical approaches for patients with SUI.

Stress urinary incontinence is a common condition affecting many women, caused by loss of support of the urethra and different procedures are considered effective in all types of SUI surgeries in the past decades ( 10 – 12 ). The study of Huang et al. ( 13 ), noticed the effectiveness of the repeat sling appeared to depend on adequate post-operative urethral mobility and urethral closure pressure. Regarding the type of procedure, various studies reported that retropubic suburethral procedures have a better cure rate than transobturator procedures in SUI ( 14 , 15 ). Recent studies have revealed that the success rate of repeated suburethral sling procedures was better for slings positioned at the proximal urethra ( 4 , 16 , 17 ). Urodynamic stress incontinence is more likely observed in women with a greater sling-pubis gap, and sling location should be close to the symphysis pubic to reduce the length of the urethral funnelling ( 18 ). According to Lo et al. ( 15 ), mid urethral slings surgery including TOT and TVT, is safe for the young and aging patients with USI and demonstrated improvement in its outcomes, but objective and subjective cure rates decrease with age.

Our findings revealed no differences among the groups in terms of age, weight, height, BMI, menopausal status, history of difficult birth, cesarean section, abortion, TAH-BSO surgery, infection, or incontinence types. Postoperative anticholinergic medication uses and duration of use, as well as preoperative daily pad usage, were similar across the groups. Furthermore, there were no differences in cystocele grading among the groups, with the majority of patients having a grade 2 cystocele in the TVT, TOT, and BC groups. Although the BC group showed 100% grade 1 rectocele, this difference was not significant compared to the other groups.

Our study has several limitations that should be acknowledged. First, the relatively small sample size of each treatment group might limit the generalizability of the results. Second, we did not account for potential confounding factors such as the surgeon's experience, patient compliance, and postoperative care, which could affect treatment outcomes. Additionally, the follow-up period was not uniform across all participants, which may introduce potential bias in the assessment of outcomes. Lastly, the lack of a standardized outcome measure to assess treatment success limits the comparison of results with other studies. Despite these limitations, our study has several strengths that merit attention. We included a diverse patient population with various clinical presentations of SUI, which increases the external validity of the findings. We also provided a comprehensive assessment of patient demographics, medical history, and incontinence types, which offers a holistic view of the patient characteristics associated with SUI. Furthermore, we performed rigorous statistical analyses, taking into account potential confounders and differences among the groups, to provide a robust evaluation of the outcomes. Finally, our study directly compared multiple surgical treatment options for primary SUI, which can contribute to the development of personalized treatment strategies for patients with SUI.

Our results indicate that demographic and clinical characteristics, including age, weight, height, BMI, menopause status, history of difficult birth, caesarean section, abortion, TAH- BSO surgery, infection, incontinence type, postoperative anticholinergic use and duration, preoperative daily pad usage, and cystocele and rectocele grades, were similar among patients undergoing TVT, TOT, BC, or APR surgical interventions for urinary incontinence. Therefore, the choice of surgical approach can be tailored to individual patient needs, taking into consideration factors such as expertise, preference, and comorbidity. Further research with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods is needed to better assess the long-term outcomes and potential advantages of each surgical approach.